/* * Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166 * Expert Group and released to the public domain, as explained at * http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ */ /** * A small toolkit of classes that support lock-free thread-safe * programming on single variables. In essence, the classes in this * package extend the notion of {@code volatile} values, fields, and * array elements to those that also provide an atomic conditional update * operation of the form: * *
 {@code boolean compareAndSet(expectedValue, updateValue);}
* *

This method (which varies in argument types across different * classes) atomically sets a variable to the {@code updateValue} if it * currently holds the {@code expectedValue}, reporting {@code true} on * success. The classes in this package also contain methods to get and * unconditionally set values, as well as a weaker conditional atomic * update operation {@code weakCompareAndSet} described below. * *

The specifications of these methods enable implementations to * employ efficient machine-level atomic instructions that are available * on contemporary processors. However on some platforms, support may * entail some form of internal locking. Thus the methods are not * strictly guaranteed to be non-blocking -- * a thread may block transiently before performing the operation. * *

Instances of classes * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean}, * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger}, * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong}, and * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference} * each provide access and updates to a single variable of the * corresponding type. Each class also provides appropriate utility * methods for that type. For example, classes {@code AtomicLong} and * {@code AtomicInteger} provide atomic increment methods. One * application is to generate sequence numbers, as in: * *

 {@code
 * class Sequencer {
 *   private final AtomicLong sequenceNumber
 *     = new AtomicLong(0);
 *   public long next() {
 *     return sequenceNumber.getAndIncrement();
 *   }
 * }}
* *

It is straightforward to define new utility functions that, like * {@code getAndIncrement}, apply a function to a value atomically. * For example, given some transformation *

 {@code long transform(long input)}
* * write your utility method as follows: *
 {@code
 * boolean getAndTransform(AtomicLong var) {
 *   while (true) {
 *     long current = var.get();
 *     long next = transform(current);
 *     if (var.compareAndSet(current, next))
 *         return current;
 *   }
 * }}
* *

The memory effects for accesses and updates of atomics generally * follow the rules for volatiles, as stated in * The Java Language * Specification, Third Edition (17.4 Memory Model): * *

* *

In addition to classes representing single values, this package * contains Updater classes that can be used to obtain * {@code compareAndSet} operations on any selected {@code volatile} * field of any selected class. * * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater}, * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater}, and * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLongFieldUpdater} are * reflection-based utilities that provide access to the associated * field types. These are mainly of use in atomic data structures in * which several {@code volatile} fields of the same node (for * example, the links of a tree node) are independently subject to * atomic updates. These classes enable greater flexibility in how * and when to use atomic updates, at the expense of more awkward * reflection-based setup, less convenient usage, and weaker * guarantees. * *

The * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicIntegerArray}, * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLongArray}, and * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReferenceArray} classes * further extend atomic operation support to arrays of these types. * These classes are also notable in providing {@code volatile} access * semantics for their array elements, which is not supported for * ordinary arrays. * * *

The atomic classes also support method {@code weakCompareAndSet}, * which has limited applicability. On some platforms, the weak version * may be more efficient than {@code compareAndSet} in the normal case, * but differs in that any given invocation of the * {@code weakCompareAndSet} method may return {@code false} * spuriously (that is, for no apparent reason). A * {@code false} return means only that the operation may be retried if * desired, relying on the guarantee that repeated invocation when the * variable holds {@code expectedValue} and no other thread is also * attempting to set the variable will eventually succeed. (Such * spurious failures may for example be due to memory contention effects * that are unrelated to whether the expected and current values are * equal.) Additionally {@code weakCompareAndSet} does not provide * ordering guarantees that are usually needed for synchronization * control. However, the method may be useful for updating counters and * statistics when such updates are unrelated to the other * happens-before orderings of a program. When a thread sees an update * to an atomic variable caused by a {@code weakCompareAndSet}, it does * not necessarily see updates to any other variables that * occurred before the {@code weakCompareAndSet}. This may be * acceptable when, for example, updating performance statistics, but * rarely otherwise. * *

The {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicMarkableReference} * class associates a single boolean with a reference. For example, this * bit might be used inside a data structure to mean that the object * being referenced has logically been deleted. * * The {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicStampedReference} * class associates an integer value with a reference. This may be * used for example, to represent version numbers corresponding to * series of updates. * *

Atomic classes are designed primarily as building blocks for * implementing non-blocking data structures and related infrastructure * classes. The {@code compareAndSet} method is not a general * replacement for locking. It applies only when critical updates for an * object are confined to a single variable. * *

Atomic classes are not general purpose replacements for * {@code java.lang.Integer} and related classes. They do not * define methods such as {@code hashCode} and * {@code compareTo}. (Because atomic variables are expected to be * mutated, they are poor choices for hash table keys.) Additionally, * classes are provided only for those types that are commonly useful in * intended applications. For example, there is no atomic class for * representing {@code byte}. In those infrequent cases where you would * like to do so, you can use an {@code AtomicInteger} to hold * {@code byte} values, and cast appropriately. * * You can also hold floats using * {@link java.lang.Float#floatToRawIntBits} and * {@link java.lang.Float#intBitsToFloat} conversions, and doubles using * {@link java.lang.Double#doubleToRawLongBits} and * {@link java.lang.Double#longBitsToDouble} conversions. * * @since 1.5 */ package java.util.concurrent.atomic;